From Grief to Growth: My Move to Taiwan

This is a part of my life story I’ve never publicly shared before.

I’m opening up now because recently, many people have asked me what brought me to Taiwan. Normally, I give shallow or surface-level answers. But the truth is, there’s a deeper story — a life chapter that made me determined to move to Taiwan, and today I’m ready to share it.

A few days ago, May 21st, would have marked my dad’s 60th birthday — if he were still alive. He passed away when I was 18 after a tragic car accident. He didn’t survive, but my mom and I did.

To this day, he remains in my heart as the kindest, most intelligent, and most honest person I’ve ever known. He and my mom have always been the true loves of my life — the most beloved people I’ve ever had, and that will never change.

Appreciate your parents. Always.

After his passing, I had to grow up fast — not only financially, but mentally and spiritually too. I lost my anchor, my guru, my safe space — the one person I could talk to about everything from books and life philosophy to, well… high school boys. He could read people so well, while I was still learning.

By then, I had completed my first year of college with mostly A’s. But my mom and I couldn’t afford the second year. She had just come out of the hospital after a complicated surgery for her badly broken arm. I was only 18, but the weight of life felt heavier than anything I’d experienced — even heavier than growing up in poverty. I was grieving the loss of my father while trying to stay strong for my mom, who was in pain and unable to work.

I was ready to quit school and find a job to support both of us. But my lovely aunt stepped in to help. She and I went to my college dean, who, recognizing my academic record, kindly granted me a scholarship. For some reason, academics had never been hard for me — I loved learning. I was the type to skip boring lectures and sneak off to the library to read more interesting books with my classmates.

Then came a turning point. At the start of my final year, a few seniors from our Foreign Politics department returned from a year of Chinese language study in Taiwan. They spoke of Taiwan like it was a fairy tale — and I was enchanted.

Since childhood, I had always dreamed of living somewhere tropical, eating fresh fruit every day — a stark contrast to my snowy Siberian hometown, where winters lasted five months. I remembered sitting with my dad, exploring the world map together, talking about places like Ecuador and dreaming about a warm life surrounded by ocean and greenery.

Once again, my kind dean supported me. He encouraged me to take a year off and apply for a Chinese language program in Taiwan. There were only two scholarship spots, and my classmate and I got in.

I’ll never forget my first impression of Taiwan:

“Indeed, it’s a fabulous place,” I thought as the plane descended. Having never flown over the ocean before, I felt like we were about to land on it. The lush green landscape reminded me of the lyrics from my dad’s favorite song, “My White Birds”:

“Go and find the distant isles

Where the grass is green for miles —

There still live the words of peace and love

That we’ve forgotten up above.”

My first 10 months in Taiwan were life-changing — and not just academically. I had to learn to survive in a foreign country with limited funds (our scholarship only covered tuition) and minimal language skills — basic English and beginner-level Chinese.

When I boarded the plane back to Russia, I burst into tears — and I rarely cry. A Korean girl sitting next to me gave me a candy to comfort me. It was sweet and funny… and I’ll never forget her kindness.

Back in Russia, I felt another wave of depression. Once again, I didn’t feel like I fit in. I was used to it. In both high school and college, I had few friends — most of them boys. For some reason, I’ve always found it difficult to form close friendships with women. My way of thinking has always been a little different, so my circle remained small, even if I knew many people.

Maybe all of this — the loss, the loneliness, the longing for something more — led me to realize I had nothing to lose by leaving my country. I believed there was a whole other world waiting for me, and Taiwan felt like it.

I learned that the only way to legally work in Taiwan as a foreigner from a non-English-speaking country was to graduate from a local university with a master’s degree. So, in my final year of undergrad, I applied for a Taiwanese government scholarship.

To make ends meet, I started selling French meal replacement supplements and saving for the plane ticket. I skipped classes (which I rarely did) to work — and then studied on my own at night. I also earned a bit of money by writing short publications for my city’s local government on Taiwan’s science park policies. My beloved dean arranged the payments.

At the same time, he tried to convince me to immigrate to Israel. I declined. I also turned down an offer from the Russian FBI. Why? Because Taiwan never left my mind — just like my dad never left my heart.

“Go and find the distant isles

Where the grass is green for miles —

There still live the words of peace and love

That we’ve forgotten up above.”

Looking back, I realize that every experience — no matter how painful, uncertain, or unexpected — was guiding me back to something deeper. Something I had forgotten:

My inner strength, my clarity, and the part of me that always knew where I belonged.

Sometimes, life takes everything away so we can finally come home to ourselves.

Losing my father, facing financial hardship, leaving my homeland — all of it led me to rediscover not just a new place to live, but a new way of being.

We often think we need to chase the future, but often, it’s the journey itself that brings us back to the forgotten parts of who we truly are.

Let your pain be a compass. Let your dreams lead you. And most importantly — listen to that quiet voice within you. It always knows the way home.

Energy Clarity Heart 

Written by Irina Le

Dystopia, octopus intelligence, and what makes us human.

This books has a fascinatingly unique perspective. May be, I’m biased, because octopuses are my favorite ones. However, this book and discussion are not really about octopuses, or even other species, but about us.

Indeed, we have an empathy crisis and the industrial civilization with doomed beliefs that technology can save us is responsible for it fueling this crisis further as it’s feeding on it. 

We treat nature as resources to be consumed to support our addictive way of life. We do not treat nature as an equal or a wiser species. As long as we have this ego/human-centered attitude, we are nowhere else but on the path of self-destruction. 

As barely a dozen of folks read my article, they probably all agree, but tomorrow they will do nothing about it, because who cares about saving octopuses or other 200 hundred species which go extinct every 24 hours? 

We are merely a reflection of what our society wants us to care about, what and who to like, what to think and what to do. We are merely slaves to the propaganda that surrounds us 24/7, the propaganda of illusion that humans are the center of the world as once they believed they were the center of the universe. 

This way of thinking tells only one truth about ourselves that we’ll probably never embrace: we are under evolved and unspecial. If you think you are evolved or special, do things without thinking on yourself. Can you? Isn’t it an interestingly challenging exercise even to think on anything? This is how our society is run; it’s all about constructing an image of our own importance; individually or collectively; Tik Tok is more popular than real issues.

Written by Irina Le

反烏托邦、章魚智慧以及是什麼讓我們成為人類

這本書有一個迷人的獨特視角。我也可能有偏見因為章魚是我最喜歡的。然而,這本書和討論並不是關於章魚或甚至也不是關於其他物種,而是關於我們。

事實上,我們有一場移情危機而工業文明注定要相信科技可以拯救我們,它造成這場危機進一步加劇的原因,因為它正在以它為食。

我們將自然視為資源,以支持我們令人上癮的生活方式。我們不將自然視為平等或更明智的物種。只要我們有這種以自我/以人為中心的態度,我們就在自我毀滅的道路上。

由於只有十幾個人閱讀了我的文章,他們可能都同意,但明天他們將對此無所作為,因為誰在乎拯救章魚或其他每 24 小時滅絕的 200個物種?

我們只是反映我們的社會希望我們關心什麼、喜歡什麼和喜歡誰、想什麼和做什麼。我們只是圍繞著我們 24/7 的宣傳的奴隸,宣傳人類是世界的中心,就像之前我們都相信我們是宇宙的中心。

這種思維只表示一件事:我們可能永遠不會接受的關於我們自己的真相:我們還沒有進化而且我們並不是特別的。如果你認為自己是進化的或特別的,那麼做事時不要考慮自己。你做得到嗎?這難道不是一個有趣挑戰的練習?我們的社會就是這樣運作的;這一切都是為了建立一個我們自己重要的形象;單獨地或集體地:抖音比現實的問題更受歡迎。

為何舞蹈也是一種環保

很多人把跳舞當作一個很難學習的生活技能,

我常常聽到了:我學舞已經太晚/我學舞已經太老了…

我跟這些客戶說:我最多跳舞的經驗都來自我已經很大人的時候😄,大學畢業後才開始重新跳舞,您也一定可以!😁

我小時候在俄羅斯(西伯利亞)開始跳國標舞但跳幾年後就放棄了因為家裡的經濟不夠讓我維持這興趣。後來,我來台灣讀書,畢業以及開始工作,存錢以去重新學舞。

舞蹈💃不只一個生活技能,它也是一種健身。跳舞是身體和心裡的健康因為跳舞的時候我們可以跟其他人社交以及交朋友。再來,跳舞也是跟你的身體一種溝通;學舞和練舞讓你理解你身體的能力和健康度。我們現在的人太多時間花在無動身體的環境以及過度使用手機&電腦。根究許多研究我們這一種生活方式已影響到我們的精神和身體的健康。我一直在想這樣還蠻浪費社會的資源,例如說:健保,這樣也增加已經很辛苦的醫療員工的工作。

社會資源也是我們珍貴自的然資源;我們大家可以透過舞蹈的身體和精神的健身多一點節省資源。我們大家可以多一點脫離我們的小工具以多一點專注我們美麗的世界為了幫助自己同時幫助社會。

留心,保持健康並生活在此時此刻。

Stay mindful, stay healthy and be present.

Written by Irina Le 伊麗愛

We can’t see past the choices we don’t understand.

We can only act based on our own level of awareness.

“The choice is an illusion created between those with power and those without.” ~Merovingian

Free will is an illusion, so the choice is an illusion. (Ref: numerous research neuroscience, human behavior, biology, and physics). We function as quantum particles between the states of nature, nurture, and quantum projections. Just like in quantum physics, particles that are about to make a leap make the leap, and the choice is like a quantum projection that changes the state.

What happens in Siberia doesn’t stay in Siberia

My homeland, one of the coldest places on Earth🌍, is on fire 🔥 again. Siberian heatwaves have been exacerbating with each year. Around my hometown (Tomsk) in Western Siberia 🌲, there has been a hugely increased number of bears 🐻 who migrated from Eastern Siberia due to the wildfires there 🔥. Poor animals have become climate change refugees thanks to human stupidity.

The wildfires are 10X more than usual due to the hottest and driest summer on record. For the first time in history, the smoke reached the North pole.

Few realize that arctic permafrost contains a third of the world’s carbon-rich soil. This ancient permafrost stores thousands of years of carbon — fuel. Lightning usually ignites the fires in the first place. Burning peat is particularly destructive, because its greater heat melts permafrost and oxidizes the underlying peat, emitting destructive greenhouse gases. Burning peat releases more than 100 times more carbon than a traditional wildfire.

Zombie Fires Ravage Siberia

Russia’s 2021 Wildfires Now Largest in Its Recorded History

在西伯利亞發生的事情會超越西伯利亞

我的家鄉,地球上最冷的地方之一🌍,又火災了🔥西伯利亞的熱浪每年都在加劇 由於東西伯利亞的野火🔥熊🐻遷移過來的我的家鄉(西西伯利亞)造成熊的數量大大增加了。由於人類的愚蠢,可憐的動物已經成為氣候變化的難民了

由於有破記錄以來最熱和最乾燥的夏季,野火比平時多 10 倍。歷史上第一次,煙霧到達了北極

很少有人意識到北極永久凍土包含世界上三分之一的富含碳的土壤。這個古老的永久凍土層儲存了數千年的碳——燃料。閃電通常首先點燃火災。燃燒泥炭的破壞性特別大,因為它產生的熱量會融化永久凍土並氧化下面的泥炭,釋放出破壞性的溫室氣體。燃燒泥炭釋放的碳是傳統野火的 100 多倍

殭屍大火肆虐西伯利亞

俄羅斯 2021 年的野火現在是其有記錄以來最大的

Written by Irina Le

You were always living for somewhere where you aren’t

Alan Watts on escaping the rate race.

“In other words, you, as a disturbed mind, are trying to find peace of mind; your quest for peace of mind is the same thing as having a disturbed mind.


You work in order to make money to play. This is insane! Because you spend most of the time working. Then you come home with that and you’re supposed to play. Well, you’re pretty tired, to begin with, and we just don’t play. That’s all there is to it. You might play Saturday or something when there’s a day off. But in the evening very few people actually play; they sit and passively watch television. And they got all the money in the world.


The future is something you can not work for. For exactly the same reason that you can not work to be happy. Happiness, as it is always said, is a byproduct. And it will accrue to you becoming absorbed in something else altogether in some other quest altogether. A quest for vision, a quest for doing something, anything that may bring happiness.


And so in exactly the same way, the good future, the great society, the grand tomorrow is never going to be attained by working for it directly. When you’ve got that idea which is embodied just as much in the five-year plan as it is in the great society, of working for that thing. You will never make it. The only way you can get a good future is by a diversion from time altogether at right angles to the course of history. So what is important today is to create a diversion of such splendor that people will forget about the things they think are important. All their squabbles, all their ridiculous projects for destroying the planet in the name of progress.”

Written by Irina Le

地球還是你的生活方式?

我剛學到一個新的單字,就是台灣人怎麼教保護大自然/為支持生命而戰的團體:

「環保蟑螂」 🌏

我認為這是一個讚揚因為:

1. 蟑螂的生存能力很強;

2. 蟑螂對生態功能非常重要🌿,

那反對“環保蟑螂”的人類的功能呢?

大部分人會不是為支持生命而戰,他們會為他們的生活方式而戰因為他們捨不得高消費生活。當人們的權利取決於不了解某事時,就很難讓他們了解某事。大部分人都試圖將他們的行為合理化以求得舒適,卻忘記了他們的舒適取決於真實的🌏就是大自然生命支持系統。

談台灣有沒有缺點沒有很多意義因為不管台灣有沒有缺電許多科學家和科學研究不斷地跟我們說為了繼續生存我們要突破地節能!我們看一下台灣怎麼“節能”。

台灣那麼小,用電量那麼多!

人口排名57⭕️

但用電力的量排名15⭕️

比大部分發達的國家還前面!

在亞洲第7⭕️名人均用電量全世界12⭕️名!

在自然世界完全消失並將我們帶走之前,是時候採取行動了嗎?是時候抗議破壞我們最後的海洋🌊🦀跟土地🌳🌲生態的工業❌🏭?

眾所周知,整個系統都賣光了:化石燃料、綠能、甚至很多環保組織,名單是無止境的。幾乎沒有任何屬於大自然的東西了。 如果我們不會支持我們的餘生,還有誰會為我們這樣做? 外星人嗎?


你想拯救我們地球上的餘生嗎?或者你想挽救你的生活方式嗎?
許多科學研究表示你不能兩者兼得。

By Irina Le 伊麗愛

參考資料:

https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_electricity_consumption

https://www.indexmundi.com/map/?v=81000

論「經濟持續發展」

兩黨國家的政府把民眾分兩邊,這樣對政府來講,控制人的思維有比較簡單有比較有效率。所謂的再生能源是很賺錢,是另外一個方式繼續我們的生活方式(發達國家的平均人的消費比之前的國王還多)來繼續破壞更多環境。又回到問題點:到底需要多少能源?到底我們要怎麼樣的社會:消費為主還是大自然為主?自我思維Egosystem thinking還是生態思維Ecosystem thinking?

政府找民眾討論這議題:怎麼重新設計社會方式?怎麼重新培養價值觀?

有參與過了幾個社會和環保相關的團體,大部分都太政治類的:論哪一個黨的策略比較好或比較壞,論哪一個能源方式比較好或比較壞,等等。我們在這個消費為主利潤為主的社會倫這個沒有意義!能源已經很久被企業政府買下來了去推廣自己的立場買給老百姓,繼續把他們分兩邊。這樣控制社會最好的方式,兩邊專心在打架時候公司的政府就能完成更多賺錢的計畫:”經濟發展讓我賺很多錢🤑”。

可以多看金錢社會相關的書了解一下政府跟金錢永恆的愛或者到看時代精神運動和維納斯計畫的頻道看紀錄片。

「還好人民並不清楚我們的銀行與貨幣系統,一旦人民知道真相,我相信明天太陽升起以前就會發生革命」~亨利·福特

我們看一下流行的「經濟持續發展」:

請大家看清楚而想這些字

「經濟」

「持續」

「發展」

這些三個字總共在一起跟支持自然為主的文明有什麼關係呢?

「經濟」就是賣光資源

「發展」就是增加人類的影響

「持續」就是不斷地做經濟發展

工業文明/消費為主的社會一定要生長,發展是它的規則,不然它會崩潰。但因為根據物理定律不斷的生長不存在,這個社會一定會崩潰。

我們做什麼了付出為屬於地球的生態而戰留下來下一代嗎?

現在主流環保運動不是像40年前為了救一個河流或一個動物的品種而戰,是為了延續我們的生活方式而戰所以推廣「經濟持續發展」所謂“可再生能源”要替代化石燃料源的立場。需要提供多少科學證明解釋替代不是辦法!是突破大量的節能才是!

沒有任何類型的能量是無辜的,有些可再生能源比化石燃料源還污染!在恐怖一點:如果用可再生能源去替代所有的化石燃料源我們地球的土地跟海洋的生態不夠!這些“乾淨能源”公司已經買下來了他們的權利去挖海洋,破壞我們還不認識的生態因為陸地上的礦石已經不夠去陪到他們的能源轉型計畫!這是「持續」?不是,這就是「經濟持續發展」,這三個單字是互相矛盾,這些都是企業政府最喜歡講的以滿足相信他們的老百姓。但我們從科學知識知道「經濟持續發展」是無法完成的。

我們知道很久;在1970年代評估地球承載能力的國際報告出來以後一直都提醒我們地球超調日Earth overshoot day。在那個時代我們已經開始超越地球承載能力。我們沒有慢下來而我們加速了:科技越發達,人口越多,生活品質越高,破壞地球的速度越快。生態崩潰,物種滅絕,氣候變化,大流行病等等都是我們金錢為主工業文明的後果。我們還覺得更多科技的發展會解決這些災難呢?

許多的科學研究表示不會,工業文明會崩潰,只需要深入地了解歷史和物理事情都很清楚。沒有任何的東西能用有限的資源而不斷地增長。再多的科技和人類的聰明才智都不可能推翻物理定律,即支配地球的定律。

如果你選培養生態思維Ecosystem thinking以及支持大自然為主的社會歡迎加入反抗工業文明來救而恢復我們地球上的🌍餘生。

我從2015做了研究志工以及幫助科學家收數據:氣候變化,滅絕危機,生態崩潰,有興趣我可以分享我的演講。這一段時間讀了一堆科學資料,我可以提供給大家分享一下,不過這些都是英文版。

需要的話我也可以安排線上說明會用中文解釋這些應該每一個人需要了解的事實你跟我跟他跟她都需要空氣,水,食物而生存。

拜託大家支持政府的計畫前多一點了解相關科學資料,自己去判斷他們計劃的傷害😔

也我希望台灣不會變成像國外的「經濟持續發展」的國家。

By 伊麗愛 Irina Le

Love in fight for Life: our precious coastline

It’s hard to make people understand something when their entitlement depends on not understanding it.

Below are some of my takeaways from the conversation with the book’s authors “Bright Green Lies” Derrick Jensen, Lierre Keith, and Max Wilbert.

When people ask “How can we stop global warming?”, what they’re really asking is “How do we stop global warming without stopping industrial civilization, without stopping industrial fishing, without stopping the murder of the oceans?”

And the answer is YOU CAN’T. It’s like asking: “How can I stop emphysema without stopping smoking?”

“How do we save the salmon?” What they’re really asking is “How do we save the salmon without removing dams, without stopping industrial logging?”

We think we’re so clever when we make a lithium-ion battery that stores 1 megajoule per kilogram but nature made this thing called ‘fat’ which is 37 megajoules per kilogram. And we’re so excited when we make something that has less than a third of the energy storing capacity of a potato.

We hear that Costa Rica is a miracle because 72% of its electricity comes from hydropower. One of the problems is hydropower is counted as carbon neutral but in fact…Let’s ignore the fact that hydropower kills rivers, land inundated under reservoirs. In addition, it ends up that it’s actually even worse for the climate than burning coal, for example. They call dams methane bombs because they produce so much methane, and they produce more greenhouse emissions than coal. Yet we pretend that our accounting systems are more important than what happens in reality. It’s pretty much the entire culture in that show.

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it”. ~ Upton Sinclair

I’d say: “It’s hard to make people understand something when their entitlement depends on not understanding it.”

The sorrow and the grief is a coal-burning inside and it never goes away; the pain never stops. When you allow yourself to feel that pain it does kill you. But there’s a wonderful thing about being dead which is once you’re dead they can’t touch you anymore because the you that dies is the you that is identified with the system more than with the planet.

By Max Wilbert

When the truth sweeps you away, you feel like you’re lost in a storm at night. I just want to tell people: that grief is yours; it’s a sacred thing. It’s like a gift from the world; you grieve for what you love, what you respect, and what you revere. It’s a true gift; that isn’t something to be afraid of or run away from. It’s something to embrace and honor.

We don’t have a magic wand to make industrial civilization go away; we wish that we could but the strongest thing we have is that love. If we revere, we respect it, we work to build that emotion in all of us; that is the power that will carry us through that grief and through all the struggle that we have to get through.

Written by Irina Le

Take a listen to the conversation and you’re welcome to reflect on your takeaways from there:

The Myth of progress: Toward a sustainable future.

Below is a short overview of “The Myth of Progress: Toward a sustainable future” book by another brilliant systems thinker and ecologist Tom Wessels. The book encompasses the systems science perspective which is a great shortage in academic and non-academic circles.

A provocative critique of Western progress from a scientific perspective. In this compelling and cogently argued book, Tom Wessels demonstrates how our current path toward progress, based on continual economic expansion and inefficient use of resources, runs absolutely contrary to three foundational scientific laws that govern all complex natural systems. It is a myth, he contends, that progress depends on a growing economy. Wessels explains his theory with his three Laws of Sustainability: (1) the law of limits to growth, (2) the second law of thermodynamics, which exposes the dangers of increased energy consumption, and (3) the law of self-organization, which results in the marvelous diversity of such highly evolved systems as the human body and complex ecosystems. These laws, scientifically proven to sustain life in its myriad forms, have been cast aside since the eighteenth century, first by western economists, political pragmatists, and governments attracted by the idea of unlimited growth, and more recently by a global economy dominated by large corporations, in which consolidation and oversimplification create large-scale inefficiencies in material and energy usage. Wessels makes scientific theory readily accessible by offering examples of how the Laws of Sustainability function in the complex systems we can observe in the natural world around us. He shows how systems such as forests can be templates for developing sustainable economic practices that will allow true progress. Demonstrating that all environmental problems have their source in the Myth of Progress’s disregard for the Laws of Sustainability, he concludes with an impassioned argument for cultural change.

CHAPTERS

THE MYTH OF CONTROL: COMPLEX VS LINEAR SYSTEMS

Our culture is pretty much immersed in the linear paradigm which has been powerful but very limited when you’re dealing with complex systems. One of the postulates of such thinking is ‘it worked in the past so it will continue working in the present’ which completely ignores feedback loops. Everything that we deal with, except machines, are complex systems. In linear systems, there’s a sense that if you know the parts, you know the system then you can control it. That’s why a lot of our interventions in things like foreign policy and others are misguided; we try to fix particular little things without understanding the system. So that is the myth of control. In complex systems, however, we can’t control things; there are feedback loops, there are bifurcation events, things we can’t anticipate. We can end up having more havoc or problems by not understanding that. What we need to do is to see systems in a much larger holistic way and see if there’re points of intervention we can work with instead of tweaking with parts and/or changing them. What’s needed is looking at and dealing with the whole dynamics.

THE MYTH OF GROWTH: LIMITS AND SUSTAINABILITY

We don’t have any examples of systems that continuously grow; all systems are nested within other systems. So like our cells are nested within our bodies; we’re nested within the biosphere. Because of that nestedness if anyone in the system keeps growing it’s going to start degrading the larger system it’s within. You’ll get a feedback loop from that larger system that will eventually curtail that growth. So the notion we can only progress through economic growth it’s misguided especially the growth which is based on every increasing use of energy and material resources. All we do is degrading the biosphere to a greater and greater degree and then the feedback eventually kicks in and just stops that growth. 

THE MYTH OF ENERGY: THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS

I focus on the third state in my book; when a system is bleeding off more energy from its transformations than it’s taking in. That’s a state when a system becomes entropic. It moves from a state of complexity to a state of simplicity, from a state of concentration of energy and materials to a state of diffusion. Around 300 million years ago the biosphere became a mature system; it was at dynamic equilibrium but for the first time in its history it’s an entropic system now. And it’s solely because of our actions where we’re transforming such high rates of energy that we’re surpassing the amount of energy coming in and being fixed within the biosphere. So the biosphere becomes simplified; energy and materials are being diffused. 

THE MYTH OF FREE MARKET: THE LOSS OF DIVERSITY AND DEMOCRACY

As self-organizing systems are developing they are getting more complex. The complexities derive from the parts becoming ever more specialized but tightly integrated as a result self-organizing system grows increasingly resilient and stable. Coevolution is a self-organizing process and through time it’s creating species that are becoming more and more specialized which means that an ecosystem can support more and more species through time and build up a lot of repetition of function and functional critical roles. So self-organization decentralizes critical functional roles. Whenever we move in the opposite way of concentrating or centralizing critical roles, the system moves towards instability and lack of resiliency. And that’s what pretty much our market system has done.

THE MYTH OF PROGRESS: A NEED FOR CULTURAL CHANGE 

It’s about the loss of the relationship. In our culture, thanks to technological advancements that have been created at the expense of nature’s exploitation, we’ve become physically comfortable but experientially and relationally poor. Technology is a useful tool and we can use it appropriately but we have to be very wise about our technologies. Thinking that we can continuously progress and technology can solve all our problems is crazy because all the problems we are facing are the result of technologies. The problems have to be solved by us behaving in a totally different way.

Written by Irina Le